![]() ![]() What we have not finished deciding is the final configuration. But we already thought it was the right caliber for an Italian tier 10 When we developed our vessel we did not know that the 17-inch caliber was going to be implemented Therefore the last Italian battleship should have resembled the last Italian cruiser the anti-aircraft cruiser Etna We think it was very common that cruisers and battleships tended to look very similar. The final result is very similar to the battlecruiser Hood which is goodīecause it puts it at a level similar to the GneisenauĪnd clearly distinguishes it from the slow battleships like the Colorado and the Mutsu.Īs it would have been a tier 10 Italian is an election.We have chosen two things. Improve the situation of the main artillery turrets and equip it with an appropriate secondary and antiaircraft artillery. The reconstruction would have been based on increasing protection without impairing speed. They would have automatically become magnificent candidates for a higher tier. This class never came into service and according to their characteristics would have been excellent candidates for tier 6.īut if this had been rebuilt according to the model that was followed by the Cavour class, It is the name of the third battleship of the class Francesco Caracciolo. What is the battleship Francesco Morosini? We present two options for these two tiers The tier 7 that is usually covered with a "Paper ship" In the battleship branch there is a great coincidence over most tiers but it is observed that there are two gaps. In this forum there is a post with similar content but covering the entire Italian fleet. It is easy to see because it has many drawings, photos and plans. In the Spanish forum we have prepared a forecast about the future branch of Italian battleships. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |